CASI: Cold Atom Sagnac Interferometer

Introduction

Pioneering experiments at Yale [1,2] and Stanford [3] displayed recently the fascinating potential of matter-wave interferometers for precision measurements. Most prominent applications for such quantum sensors are inertial measurements, metrology and open questions in fundamental physics. For example, the measurement of rotations with atom interferometers is ten orders of magnitude more sensitive compared to optical means, underlying the same experimental parameters. Our experiment investigates different strategies for the realisation of a transportable matter-wave sensor, called CASI. CASI stands for Cold Atom Sagnac Interferometer as it uses two counterpropagating pulsed or continuous beams of cold 87Rb atoms to measure rotations thanks to the Sagnac-effect in a so-called Mach-Zehnder type atom interferometer.

In this kind of interferometer the inertial force is encoded in the phase of the atomic wavefunction via the interaction with the atom optical elements, e.g. beamsplitters and mirrors, which are realised with optical 2-photon transitions.

The use of cold atoms makes it possible to realise compact devices with sensitivities competitive with classical state-of-the-art sensors. The heart of our set-up will be a 15cm-long Mach-Zehnder interferometer in spatial and/or temporal domain consisting of 3 atom-laser interactions. The length of the complete sensor will be about 90 cm. Each of the 2 atom sources consists of 2 magneto-optical traps (MOT): A 2-dimensional MOT, which forms a brilliant atomic beam, that is loaded into a 3D MOT to prepare a cold and intense atomic ensemble.

CASI has been designed as a transportable device and can be compared with other matter-wave sensors such as the cold caesium atom gyroscope at the BNM-SYRTE in Paris [4].

 

Atom Interferometer Theory

For the realization of atom optical elements like beam splitters or mirrors, one has to think of suitable methods for manipulating the atoms. In addition to former widely used massive ruled gratings, today the interaction between light and matter is used for this purpose. This can be understood as a coherent exchange of photons and, thus, photon momenta. This is depicted on the right side. An atomic ensemble where the atoms have two energy levels |g> and |e> is split into two parts. The interaction acts on the internal as well as external degree of freedom. Therefore, a mechanical momentum can be transferred to the diffracted part. The fraction of the number of atoms that is diffracted depends on several parameters:

As a consequence, it seems favourable to combine consecutive interactions of this type to form different path topologies. In addition, after the final interaction the number of atoms in the different output ports depends on the laser phases at the times of interaction. When the number and types of interactions is chosen such that one or several of the possible paths overlap, an interference pattern of the atomic waves can be employed and an atom interferometer arises. In this context, atom interferometers have many similarities to the well known optical ones whereas here the parts of light and matter are interchanged. As an example this technique has been used for atomic clocks since many years whereas the 'optical' transition is realized by a microwave.

In contrary to atomic clocks, where the interferometer is most sensitive to frequency changes because of the chosen topology, one can employ atom interferometers that are suitable for measuring inertial forces thanks to their sensitivity to phase changes in the light field between the different atom-light interactions. These phase changes arise from the fact, that under the influence of an external potential, e.g. the gravity field, the atoms experience different potentials for different interferometer paths. This results effectively in a temporal and/or spatial change of the times and/or points of the light-atom interaction, respectively. Naively spoken, the phase of the light field that the atoms 'see' changes.

Sagnac effect

For a better understanding of our atom interferometer let us first consider the basic Sagnac effect in an easy picture:

 

 

Two waves (red W1 and blue W2) travel around an area with surface A (grey colour). Without a rotation both waves starting from point 1 arrive at the same time at the end point 2. But when the area A rotates with angular velocity W the waves arrive at different times at the end point 2. In that case, despite a time difference, both waves arrive at the end point with a different phase. This Sagnac phase f must be calculated in relativistic terms and can be expressed like:

 

Eq.:1

 

where A is the enclosed area, E the relativistic energy of the considered wave and W the angular velocity of the rotation. This formula is valid for all natures of waves and, hence, also for massive particles, which can be described as de-Broglie waves. For atoms, the Sagnac phase is

Eq.:2

 

with m the atomic mass. Compared to an optical wave in the visible spectrum, the intrinsic Sagnac phase for an atom (our case: Rubidium) is 10 orders of magnitude bigger assuming equal area A. This great advantage is the main motivation for employing matter wave interferometers as inertial sensors.

Mach-Zehnder-Interferometer

As described previousely, for the measurement of rotations one has to implement an interferometer with enclosed area A perpendicular to the axis of rotation. A good choice for this purpose is the analogon to the optical Mach-Zehnder type interferometer. In this type, a 50:50 beam splitter first devides the incoming wave into two equal parts, then a mirror redirects the diverging waves and finally both parts are recombined with another 50:50 beam splitter.

 

 

As can be imagined, this scheme can be realised for atomic waves with well controlled laser light fields using the type of interaction described previously.

 

 

In terms of atom optics, the beam splitters, respectively the mirrors, are named p/2 and p pulses for historical reasons. As denoted in the picture, the number of atoms in the two output ports now depends on the laser phases f during each interaction. This specific laser phase, demonstrated here with the laser wavefronts, can now be altered due to external potentials. For example, for an acceleration in the direction of the beam before the last p/2 pulse, the atom can therefore now be in an antinode of the light field, as it would have been in an node without the acceleration. The result would be a different interference pattern between the 2 atomic paths and hence different output intensities.

Experiment

The targeted goal of realising an extremely sensitive sensor for rotations gives several stringent requirements to the experimental setup:

Another goal is the transportability of the entire experiment.This has two reasons: First for a possible comparison of two atomic rotation sensors (see GOM_homepage), and also as a ground based test facility for future satellite missions (see HYPER_homepage).

Atomic source

As previously mentioned, CASI is working with laser-cooled atoms. One atomic source consists of a double MOT-system, which is a 2-dimensional MOT, that is loading a 3D-MOT with high atomic flux. From the 3D-MOT the atoms are launched onto a ballistic parabolic trajectorie using the moving molasses technique. In principle, the 3D-MOT can also function as a post-cooling stage only, to be operated in a continuus mode, which would result in a collimated cold atomic beam.

The reason for the use of cold atoms is the following: As can be seen from Eq.:1, the Sagnac phase is proportional to the enclosed area A. This area depends both on the interferometer length L and the ratio of the transverse to longitudinal velocity:

 

 

 

As the interferometer length is limited by the reqiurement of a transportable setup and the transverse velocity is mainly determined by the used photon's momentum, the option for CASI is to improve the velocity ratio to get a biggest area as possible. Although multiple photon kicks could in principle be used, our approach is to reduce the atomic launch velocity. Therefore laser cooling seems well suited, as the velocity spread of the atoms can also be reduced in that way.

As already described in [1], CASI will also use two sources, that are emitting atoms in opposing directions. As the interferometer lasers are applied perpendicular to the atomic launch direction, in this way a differential measurement can be achieved: Most of the external perturbations will cause an interferometer phase shift, that is independent of the atom's velocity direction, whereas the sign of the Sagnac phase changes, with changing the atomic velocity direction. So, by using two atom interferometers, that use the same laser beams, and substracting these signals, the desired rotational signal can be read out only.

Interferometer laser

As it is important to have a well controlled frequency and phase for the beam splitting lasers, CASI will use a Phase locked Raman Laser System for this purpose. This has several advantages: The use of 2-photon Raman transitions between different atomic Hyperfine ground levels allows to treat the atom as an effective 2-level system, because spontaneous emission can be neglected and the spectral resolution of the transitions is high. As the two Raman beams are applied in counterpropagating directions, the atom will absorb a photon from one beam, which is reemitted into the other beam. That way, the atom gets the double transverse velocity. The phase-lock is implemented at 6,8 GHz, the Rubidium-87 Hyperfine splitting between ground levels F=1 and F=2. For this frequency, well established microwave equipment can be used.

The Laser itself are Diode Lasers in MOPA configuration. The same scheme is used for the cooling light for the two sources. By using diodes, the benefits are low cost and easy to use Laser sources.

Detection

For a good signal-to-noise ratio, the detection of both output ports is planned. A well controlled atomic number at the interferometer input is in principle not needed that way, but still favourable. The detection scheme, as well as the state preparation entering the interferometer, relies on optical pumping and fluorescence detection. It is very similar to the techniques used in atomic fountain clocks and therefore well established.

Current status

At the moment, the experiment is still under construction, but several experimental steps have already been achieved. The atomic sources have been realised and the crucial experimental parameters were characterized. Examples are given in the picture below.

 

 

A first version of the Raman-Laser-System has been set up and characterized. The graphics below show a picture of the two lasers and a measurement of the laser beatnote at 6,834 GHz recorded on a fast photodiode. Our MOPA Lasers deliver each more than 500 mW optical power and the residual phase error between them is about 0,039 rad. For highest resolution rotation measurements this will be further improved (expected phase error ~ 1mrad) with the use of a ultrastable microwave reference oscillator. This oscillator system has already been build in cooperation with BNM-SYRTE and will replace the actual oscillator soon.

 

                             

    

As the two key components of the experiment, sources and Raman Laser, had been set up, we performed a first serious of atom interferometric measurements. These were just for testing purposes, and without a sensitivity to inertial forces. Shown below are Rabi oscillations between the 2 atomic ground states |F=1,mf=0> and |F=2,mf=0> while changing the interaction time of the Raman Laser with the atoms. The measurements were performed in the horizontal fountain geometry, this means with freely falling atoms.

 

 

                                          

 

For testing the sensitivity to any frequency effects (e.g. Zeeman-, AC-Stark) we can perform a Ramsey-type measurement, which is a serious of two p/2-pulses encolsing a free evolution time. Scanning the frequency difference of the lasers results in a Ramsey pattern like it is also shown above.

Finally we performed measurements in a Mach-Zehnder-type topology, here in time domain. While scanning the difference in Raman-Laser phases between the last 2 pulses we produce the well known interferometer fringes.

                                                                                       

 At the moment we are working on systematic studies for improving several experimental steps, that are not inertial sensitive, for example atomic state preparation or different detection schemes. After that we plan to do first interferometric measurements in time domain that are actually sensitive to rotations. For this purpose, an anti-vibration platform, which will support the whole experimental platform, has already been tested.

 

Publications:

 

Differential atom interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit, K. Eckert, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, U. Poulsen, M. Lewenstein, C. Jentsch, T. Müller, E.M. Rasel and W. Ertmer

PRA 73, 013814 (2006)

 

Atom Optics, Guided Atoms, and Atom Interferometry . J.J. Arlt, G. Birkl, E.M. Rasel and W. Ertmer, Adv. At. Mol. Opt.Phys. 50, 55-89 (2005)

 

HYPER: A Satellite Mission in Fundamental Physics Based on High Precision Atom Interferometry, C. Jentsch et. al, Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 10, 2193 (2004)

 

HYPER: Hyper-Precision Cold Atom Interferometry in Space, E.M. Rasel et al. ESA Assesment Study Report, ESA-SCI (2000) 10

 

Group members:

 

Dr. Ernst Rasel, group leader

Tobias Müller, PhD student

Thijs Wendrich, PhD student

Michael Gilowski, Diploma student

 

 

Former members:

Dr. Christian Jentsch

 

 

 

 

References:

[1] Gustavson, T.L., Landragin, A., and Kasevich, M.A., Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 2385 (2000)

[2] Snadden, M.J., McGuirk, J.M., Bouyer, P., Haritos, K.G., and Kasevich, M.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 971 (1998)

[3] Peters, A., Chung, K.Y., and Chu, S., Metrologia 38, 25 (2001)

[4] Yver-Leduc, F., Cheinet, P., Fils, J., Clairon, A., Dimarcq, N., Holleville, D., Bouyer, P., and Landragin, A., J. Opt. B 5, 36 (2003)

 

For further information regarding the experiment or for job opportunities, please contact: rasel@iqo.uni-hannover.de